Bayesian analysis of self-undermining arguments in physics

Analysis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some theories in physics seem to be ‘self-undermining’: that is, if they are correct, we are probably mistaken about the evidence that apparently supports them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Atheistic Induction by Boltzmann Brains.Bradley Monton - 2018 - In Jerry L. Walls Trent Dougherty (ed.), Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory.Doreen Fraser - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (2):126-135.
No Hope for Conciliationism.Jonathan Dixon - 2024 - Synthese 203 (148):1-30.
Self-Exempting Conciliationism is Arbitrary.Simon Blessenohl - 2015 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-06

Downloads
23 (#950,505)

6 months
13 (#272,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why I Am Not a Boltzmann Brain.Sinan Dogramaci & Miriam Schoenfield - 2025 - Philosophical Review 134 (1):1-33.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references