Arrow’s Theorem and the Defense of Democracy

Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (2):109-118 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2011

ISBN(s)

08972346

DOI

10.5840/swphilreview201026247

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Serious Externalism.Thomas D. Senor - 2008 - Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):1-12.
Protagoras’ Defense of the Teachableness of Virtue.Tom Morris - 1991 - Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (2):47-65.
A Critique of Deweyan Democracy.Robert B. Talisse - 2008 - Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):181-190.
Habermas and Dewey on Democracy.Scott Bartlett - 2000 - Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (1):145-152.
On Morally Grounding National-Defense.Jeffrey Green - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (2):127-130.
Can National-Defense be Morally Grounded in Personal Self-Defense?Thomas Peard - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (1):163-171.
Butterfield on Dewey’s Idea of Democracy.Stuart Rosenbaum - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (2):47-49.
Thinking About Democracy and Exclusion.Craig Hanks - 1992 - Southwest Philosophy Review 8 (1):145-155.
Moral Considerations in Epistemic Conceptions of Democracy.Stuart Rosenbaum - 2010 - Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):163-170.
Lawrence Bonjour’s in Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW]Robert Levy - 1999 - Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (2):123-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
33 (#732,223)

6 months
4 (#913,052)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references