Australia and New Zealand are soft theocracies

Australian Humanist, The 113:11 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wallace, Max In trying to find an accurate way to describe the relationship between government and religion, I devised the term 'soft theocracy' and defined it as a 'state where church and government purposes coincide to garnishee taxpayers' money and resources, structurally through tax exemptions and functionally through grants and privileges'

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rich enough? Do church schools need government money?Max Wallace - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 111 (111):7.
When bluff isn't enough.Max Wallace - 2013 - The Australian Humanist 109 (109):19.
Non-religious tax avoidance.Max Wallace - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):9.
High court case: Williams v the commonwealth.Max Wallace - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 107 (107):5.
A secular chronology Part II 1971-2015.Max Wallace - 2016 - Australian Humanist, The 120:8.
A secular chronology, part I - 1215 to 1970.Max Wallace - 2015 - Australian Humanist, The 119:14.
The terminal decline of Christianity in New Zealand.Max Wallace - 2014 - Australian Humanist, The 114:16.
Framing New Zealand's funding of religious schools.Max Wallace - 2015 - Australian Humanist, The 117:19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
10 (#1,469,173)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references