- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An association between understanding cardinality and analog magnitude representations in preschoolers
Cognition 119 (1):10-22 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Even Early Representations of Numerical Magnitude are Spatially Organized: Evidence for a Directional Magnitude Bias in Pre-Reading Preschoolers.E. Opfer John & A. Thompson Clarissa - unknown
Epistemic Limitations and Precise Estimates in Analog Magnitude Representation.Justin Halberda - 2016 - In A. Baron & D. Barner, Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-186.
Symbolic, numeric, and magnitude representations in the parietal cortex.Miriam Rosenberg-Lee, Jessica M. Tsang, Vinod Menon, Roi Cohen Kadosh & Vincent Walsh - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):350.
Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis.Susan Carey - 2002 - Mind and Language 16 (1):37-55.
Analogue Magnitude Representations: A Philosophical Introduction.Jacob Beck - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):829-855.
The Analog-Digital Distinction Fails to Explain the Perception-Thought Distinction: An Alternative Account of the Format of Mental Representation.Piotr Kozak - 2021 - Studia Semiotyczne 35 (1):73-94.
Discovery of basic ordinality and cardinality by young preschoolers.Melvin H. Marx & Yung Che Kim - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):461-463.
A Theory of Magnitude.Vincent Walsh - 2015 - In Roi Cohen Kadosh & Ann Dowker, The Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition. Oxford University Press UK.
Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numerals?Susan Carey, Anna Shusterman, Paul Haward & Rebecca Distefano - 2017 - Cognition 168 (C):243-255.
When A is greater than B: Interactions between magnitude and serial order.Chi-Ngai Cheung - 2022 - Consciousness and Cognition 97 (C):103259.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
52 (#437,458)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
2014-01-20
Downloads
52 (#437,458)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The number sense represents (rational) numbers.Sam Clarke & Jacob Beck - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44:1-57.
Bootstrapping of integer concepts: the stronger deviant-interpretation challenge.Markus Pantsar - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):5791-5814.
Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numerals?Susan Carey, Anna Shusterman, Paul Haward & Rebecca Distefano - 2017 - Cognition 168 (C):243-255.
Cognitive Structuralism: Explaining the Regularity of the Natural Numbers Progression.Paula Quinon - 2022 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (1):127-149.
Children’s mappings between number words and the approximate number system.Darko Odic, Mathieu Le Corre & Justin Halberda - 2015 - Cognition 138 (C):102-121.
References found in this work
Core systems of number.Stanislas Dehaene, Elizabeth Spelke & Lisa Feigenson - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (7):307-314.
Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants.Fei Xu & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2000 - Cognition 74 (1):1-11.
Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.C. R. Gallistel & Rochel Gelman - 1992 - Cognition 44 (1-2):43-74.
One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Mathieu Le Corre & Susan Carey - 2007 - Cognition 105 (2):395-438.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-dwqgq uwo