What Kind of Modality Does the Materialist Need for His Supervenience Claim?

In Alexander Batthyany & Avshalom C. Elitzur (eds.), Irreducibly Conscious. Selected Papers on Consciousness. Winter. pp. 15-32 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Materialists who do not deny the existence of mental phenomena usually claim that the mental supervenes on the physical, i.e. that there cannot be a change in the mental life of a man without there being a change in the man's body. This modal claim is usually understood in terms of logical necessity. I argue that this is a mistake, resulting from assumptions inherited from logical empiricism, and that it should be understood in terms of synthetic necessity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supervenience Relations and Their Significance.Richard Cranston Paull - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Are Events Things of the Past?Julian Bacharach - 2021 - Mind 130 (518):381-412.
Essence and Mere Necessity.Jessica Leech - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82:309-332.
An apology for materialism.Alistair Renton - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Edinburgh

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-09

Downloads
345 (#82,441)

6 months
77 (#79,082)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references