Categorical Abstract Algebraic Logic: Truth-Equational $pi$-Institutions

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (2):351-378 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Finitely algebraizable deductive systems were introduced by Blok and Pigozzi to capture the essential properties of those deductive systems that are very tightly connected to quasivarieties of universal algebras. They include the equivalential logics of Czelakowski. Based on Blok and Pigozzi’s work, Herrmann defined algebraizable deductive systems. These are the equivalential deductive systems that are also truth-equational, in the sense that the truth predicate of the class of their reduced matrix models is explicitly definable by some set of unary equations. Raftery undertook the task of characterizing the property of truth-equationality for arbitrary deductive systems. In this paper, following Raftery, we extend the notion of truth-equationality for logics formalized as $\pi$-institutions and abstract several of the results that hold for deductive systems in this more general categorical context.

Other Versions

reprint Voutsadakis, George (2015) "Categorical Abstract Algebraic Logic: Referential π-Institutions". Bulletin of the Section of Logic 44(1/2):33-51

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-17

Downloads
30 (#800,372)

6 months
7 (#516,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A survey of abstract algebraic logic.J. M. Font, R. Jansana & D. Pigozzi - 2003 - Studia Logica 74 (1-2):13 - 97.
Protoalgebraic logics.W. J. Blok & Don Pigozzi - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (4):337 - 369.
Equivalential logics.Janusz Czelakowski - 1981 - Studia Logica 40 (3):227-236.
Equivalential logics (II).Janusz Czelakowski - 1981 - Studia Logica 40 (4):355 - 372.

View all 20 references / Add more references