Ecological Empiricism

Philosophia 52 (4):959-978 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both metaphysics and cognitive science raise the question of what natural concepts or properties are. A link between the two is notoriously hard to establish. I propose to take natural concepts or properties to be those that are revealed in interaction. The concept of affordances is refined and naturalized to spell out how interacting with objects grounds concepts. I will call this account “Ecological Empiricism”. I argue that the notion of naturalness within this framework turns out to be a gradable – there are more or less natural properties – and dependent on the perspective taken – metaphysically natural properties are different from cognitive natural properties. From a metaphysical point of view, perfect correlations between actions and sensory input are relevant, which are best approximated by scientific measurement. For cognition, simple or basic actions are relevant. Although metaphysical and cognitive naturalness does not coincide according to Ecological Empiricism, it presents a common framework with a uniform conception of naturalness.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Naturalness in Context.Elanor Taylor - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (4):1-24.
The Value of Naturalness.Isaac Wilhelm - forthcoming - Erkenntnis.
Naturalness by law.Verónica Gómez Sánchez - 2023 - Noûs 57 (1):100-127.
Parthood and naturalness.M. Eddon - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3163-3180.
Natural Objects.Joshua D. K. Brown - 2016 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):254-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-31

Downloads
12 (#1,377,042)

6 months
12 (#308,345)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gottfried Vosgerau
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
What is structural realism?James Ladyman - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):409-424.

View all 34 references / Add more references