Prioriteit voor patienten met een lagere levenskwaliteit

Filosofie En Praktijk 31:40-51 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper critically analyses the priority-setting rules used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK and proposed by the Netherlands' Council on Public Health and Health Care (RVZ). It argues that neither gives proper weight to improving the lot of those who are worse off than others.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice and the NICE approach.Richard Cookson - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):99-102.
Ethics, economics, and public financing of health care.Jeremiah Hurley - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (4):234-239.
The role of research in setting priorities for health care.Kathleen N. Lohr - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (1):79-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-25

Downloads
403 (#75,966)

6 months
63 (#95,132)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Voorhoeve
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references