Why People Dislike Radical Constructivism

Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):19-21 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Problem: Radical constructivism, although having a very successful base in research on mathematics and science education, has not become a generally accepted theory of knowledge. Purpose: This paper discusses possible sources of aversion. Results: The first section makes explicit the unavoidability of accepting the responsibility for one’s thinking and acting, a responsibility that under stressful circumstances one would rather avoid. Another section suggests the origin of the human quest for certain knowledge. The third section introduces the notion of “stickiness of beliefs.” Implications: Constructivism has powerful implications for everyday attitudes and social relations with others. This paper, it is hoped, may induce some readers to investigate these implications

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite.Peter Slezak - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):102-111.
Why Radical Constructivism Has not Become a Paradigm.V. Gadenne - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):77-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-20

Downloads
25 (#948,885)

6 months
3 (#1,144,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references