The Future of Research Assesment

Abstract

I make the case that research assesment should be employed to assess the scientific system, or research missions, rather than individual researchers. In order to shift to a more open science ,a thorough revision of the reward and incentives system is since long overdue. I propose here an alternative based on review of research behaviour, such as colkaboration and knowledge sharing,rather than research outcomes

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Scientific authorship in the age of collaborative research.K. Brad Wray - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):505-514.
The problems with forbidding science.Gary E. Marchant & Lynda L. Pope - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):375-394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-05

Downloads
229 (#117,780)

6 months
63 (#94,487)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rene Von Schomberg
Aachen University of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

why responsible innovation.Rene Von Schomberg - 2019 - In René von Schomberg & Jonathan Hankins, International Handbook on Responsible Innovation. A global resource. Cheltenham, Royaume-Uni: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 12-32.

Add more references