A Problem of Normal Form in Natural Deduction

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):121-124 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently Ekman gave a derivation in natural deduction such that it either contains a substantial redundant part or else is not normal. It is shown that this problem is caused by a non-normality inherent in the usual modus ponens rule

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
29 (#781,382)

6 months
3 (#1,481,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jan Von Plato
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Normalizability, cut eliminability and paradox.Neil Tennant - 2016 - Synthese 199 (Suppl 3):597-616.
Necessity of Thought.Cesare Cozzo - 2014 - In Heinrich Wansing (ed.), Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 101-20.
Dag Prawitz on Proofs and Meaning.Heinrich Wansing (ed.) - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Non-transitive Correspondence Analysis.Yaroslav Petrukhin & Vasily Shangin - 2023 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (2):247-273.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references