Traditional Cardiopulmonary Criterion of Death is the Only Valid Criterion of Human Death

Scientia et Fides 9 (1):283-308 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In recent time the critique of the whole brain death as the criterion of human death, that was introduced in 1968, has been growing. The paper aims to show in systematically that there are good reasons based on empirical findings combined with Thomistic Christian anthropology to accept the traditional cardiopulmonary criterion as the criterion of human death. This will be shown through a systematic critique of other criteria of death: whole brain death, higher brain death, brain stem death, and controlled cardiac/circulatory death. The traditional cardiopulmonary criterion of death provides the opportunity to maintain the dead donor rule for organ transplantation. This also affirms the respect for human life required by the ethics of the sanctity of human life. The paper further provides a justification of dead donor rule. The paper proposes 35 minutes period after cardiac arrest to declare the patient dead, since at that time there is no possibility to autoresuscitate the heart.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Restoring the Organism as a Whole: Does NRP Resurrect the Dead?Emil J. N. Busch - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (6):27-33.
Aligning the Criterion and Tests for Brain Death.James L. Bernat & Anne L. Dalle Ave - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (4):635-641.
Re-examining death: against a higher brain criterion.Josie Fisher - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):473-476.
Is Brain Death Death?Lukas J. Meier - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-14

Downloads
24 (#909,478)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler.
Practical Ethics.Peter Singer - 1979 - Philosophy 56 (216):267-268.
Summa Contra Gentiles.Thomas Aquinas - 1975 - University of Notre Dame Press.
All Animals Are Equal.Peter Singer - 1989 - In Tom Regan & Peter Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215--226.
Are DCD Donors Dead?Don Marquis - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (3):24-31.

View all 26 references / Add more references