Socially irresponsible, unethical or business as usual? UK case of Argos Ltd. and Littlewoods Ltd. v. OFT

Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (2):150-162 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8608.2007.00485.x

Other Versions

reprint Vindelyn Smith-Hillman, A. (2007) "Socially irresponsible, unethical or business as usual? UK case of Argos Ltd. and Littlewoods Ltd. v. OFT". Business Ethics: A European Review 16(2):150-162

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Socially irresponsible, unethical or business as usual? UK case of Argos Ltd. and Littlewoods Ltd. v. OFT.A. Vindelyn Smith‐Hillman - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (2):150-162.
Business sponsorship in british schools.Sarah Large - 1997 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 6 (4):189–194.
Testing drugs on animals: A test case for socially responsible investment.Robert Taylor - 2005 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 14 (2):164–175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#505,786)

6 months
3 (#1,181,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - Philosophy 52 (199):102-105.

Add more references