A categorial mutation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):508-509 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proposal of Steels & Belpaeme (S&B) is on the right track to solve the nativist/empiricist/culturalist controversy. However, their nativist model of colour categorization does not correspond to a proper genetic model. Colour perception is the outcome of a complex process of development. A direct correspondence between genes and colour categories cannot be the right approach to the problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Colour is a culturalist category.J. van Brakel - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):507-508.
Insights from the colour category controversy.Tony Belpaeme - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):75-76.
Is color perception really categorical?Mohan Matthen - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):504-505.
Semantics versus pragmatics in colour categorization.Nick Braisby & Bradley Franks - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):181-182.
Colour categorization and the space between perception and language.Don Dedrick - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):187-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#626,265)

6 months
10 (#402,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oscar Vilarroya
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references