Ethics and Complexity: Why standard ethical frameworks cannot cope with socio-technological change

In P. Jorion (ed.), Investigating Transhumanisms and Their Narratives (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Standard ethical frameworks struggle to deal with transhumanism, ecological issues and the rising technodiversity because they are focused on guiding and evaluating human behavior. Ethics needs its Copernican revolution to be able to deal with all moral agents, including not only humans, but also artificial intelligent agents, robots or organizations of all sizes. We argue that embracing the complexity worldview is the first step towards this revolution, and that standard ethical frameworks are still entrenched in the Newtonian worldview. We first spell out the foundational assumptions of the Newtonian worldview, where all change is reduced to material particles following predetermined trajectories governed by the laws of nature. However, modern physical theories such as relativity, quantum mechanics, chaos theory and thermodynamics have drawn a much more confusing and uncertain picture, and inspired indecisive, subjectivist, relativist, nihilist or postmodern worldviews. Based on cybernetics, systems theory and the new sciences of complexity, we introduce the complexity worldview that sees the world as interactions and their emergent organizations. We use this complexity worldview to show the limitations of standard ethical frameworks such as deontology, theology, consequentialism, virtue ethics, evolutionary ethics and pragmatism. Keywords: Complexity, philosophy, ethics, cybernetics, transhumanism, universal ethics, systems ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complexity and philosophy.Francis Heylighen, Paul Cilliers & Carlos Gershenson - 2006 - In Francis Heylighen, Paul Cilliers & Carlos Gershenson (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Teaching Ethics Ecologically.Jonathan Beever - 2016 - Teaching Ethics 16 (2):195-206.
Subsumption ethics.David H. Gleason - 1999 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 29 (1):29-37.
The ethics of complexity and the complexity of ethics.Minka Woermann - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):447-463.
Complexity and sustainability.Jennifer Wells - 2013 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-03

Downloads
66 (#321,867)

6 months
66 (#88,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francis Heylighen
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.

View all 21 references / Add more references