- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Henry Prakken (1997). Logical tools for modelling legal argument. A study of defeasible reasoning in law
Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (1):35-65 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Henry Prakken (1997), Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument. A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law.Robert Alexy - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):65-72.
Henry Prakken, logical tools for modelling legal argument: A study of defeasible reasoning in law. [REVIEW]L. M. M. Royakkers - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (3):379-387.
Prakken Henry. Logical tools for modelling legal argument. A study of defeasible reasoning in law. Law and philosophy library, vol. 32. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1997, xiii + 314 pp. [REVIEW]R. P. Loui - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1840-1841.
Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken and Bart verheij (eds): Review of legal evidence and proof: Statistics, stories, logic. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (4):371-377.
Patricia Bizzell & Bruce Herzberg (eds.), The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present Henry Prakken, Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument.R. P. Loui - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3:143-150.
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law.Henry Prakken - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (1):143-146.
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument: A Study of Defeasible Reasoning in Law.Henry Prakken - 1993 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning.John F. Horty - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):1-28.
Dialectical models in artificial intelligence and law.Jaap Hage - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):137-172.
Defeasible reasoning in japanese criminal jurisprudence.Katsumi Nitta & Masato Shibasaki - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (1-2):139-159.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
55 (#392,430)
6 months
13 (#258,769)
2009-01-28
Downloads
55 (#392,430)
6 months
13 (#258,769)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction.A. S. Troelstra & Dirk Van Dalen - 1988 - Amsterdam: North Holland. Edited by D. van Dalen.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54ff658c48-svzvt uwo