Reply on behalf of Joe

Sophia 48 (4):461-465 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to W. Paul Franks’ critique (‘Why a Believer Could Believe that God Answers Prayers’) of my recent paper in Sophia (2007). I argue that Franks’ Plantinga-inspired criticism fails because it turns on the dubious assumption that the efficacy of prayer could provide evidence for the existence of God.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God and Prayer.Scott A. Davison - 2022 - Cambridge University Press.
Praying for the Dead: An Ecumenical Proposal.Benjamin McCraw - 2017 - In Kristof Vanhoutte & Benjamin W. McCraw (eds.), Purgatory: Philosophical Dimensions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 239-262.
Aristotle on Prayer.Robert Mayhew - 2007 - Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2:295-309.
The experiential problem for petitionary prayer.Shieva Kleinschmidt - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3):219-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-28

Downloads
73 (#284,033)

6 months
11 (#323,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Veber
East Carolina University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
In Defense of Pure Reason.Laurence BonJour - 2000 - Noûs 34 (2):302-311.
Metaepistemology and Skepticism.Richard Fumerton - 1997 - Mind 106 (424):782-787.

View all 7 references / Add more references