Locke’s architecture of ideas and cross-modal recognition: A new approach to Locke's answer to Molyneux's question

Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 5 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It’s been more than three hundred years since William Molyneux posed his now-famous question to John Locke. While it’s clear Locke agrees with Molyneux that someone born blind and made to see would be unable to recognize at first sight the objects he knew previously only by touch (cross-modal recognition), why Locke thinks this is never made explicit in his Essay or elsewhere. I argue here that this lack of clear textual support motivates the need for a new approach to explaining Locke’s answer to Molyneux’s question. The new approach I offer here is to consider what successful Lockean cross-modal recognition might look like given his “Architecture of Ideas,” the work of his Essay to account for mental content, from simple sensory ideas to knowledge. This allows us to identify which ideas and mental faculties he would likely consider essential for success at Molyneux’s task, and which, if lacking, explain the newly sighted man’s failure. Furthermore, this approach yields some surprising results: there is more than one reason the newly sighted person would fail. And adjusting the question to involve a cross-modal comparison of two-dimensional shapes does not require Locke to change his answer to ‘yes’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Molyneux’s question and the amodality of spatial experience.Janet Levin - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (5-6):590-610.
Locke on the Molyneux Question: A Sensible Point View.Alexander Wentzell - 2025 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):30-42.
Locke on the role of judgment in perception.Walter Ott - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):670-684.
Representing shape in sight and touch.E. J. Green - 2022 - Mind and Language 37 (4):694-714.
Leibniz on Molyneux's Question.Brian Glenney - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):247-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-10

Downloads
9 (#1,605,734)

6 months
9 (#455,646)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anna Vaughn
Sacred Heart University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references