Marxism as permanet revolution

History of Political Thought 34 (3):540-563 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that the 'permanent revolution' represented the dominant element in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' political discourse, and that it tended to overrule considerations encapsulated in 'historical materialism'. In Marx and Engels's understanding, permanent revolution did not represent a historical shortcut under exceptional circumstances, but the course revolutions in the modern era would normally take. Marx and Engels traced back the pattern to the sixteenth century. It is argued here that, in Marx and Engels, the proletarian revolution does not enter the historical agenda when industrial capitalism reaches the stage of integral development, but immediately after the bourgeois revolution, even in semi-developed countries like Germany and > France where the industrial proletariat formed only a small section of the population. Marx and Engels worked out a political rather than an economic sociology of revolution

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Anders Fjeld & Matthieu de Nanteuil - 2024 - In Matthieu de Nanteuil & Anders Fjeld (eds.), Marx and Europe: Beyond Stereotypes, Below Utopias. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 1-9.
Marxism, Revolution, and Democracy.John Hoffman - 1983 - B.R. Gruner Publishing Company.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
46 (#483,443)

6 months
4 (#1,258,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Did Marx Declare the Revolution Permanent?Lars T. Lih - 2020 - Historical Materialism 28 (3):39-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references