- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Holographic Goodness Is Not That Bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater, and Watson (2004)
Psychological Review 111 (1):261-273 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Toward a better approach to goodness: Comments on Van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996).Johan Wagemans - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):610-621.
Holography Does Not Account for Goodness: A Critique of van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996).Christian N. L. Olivers, Nick Chater & Derrick G. Watson - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (1):242-260.
Reply to A. Wayman's 'reply to L. W. J. Van der kuijp'.Leonard W. J.der Kuijp & Klaus K. Klostermaier - 1979 - Philosophy East and West 29 (4):515 - 518.
Reply to A. Wayman's 'Reply to L. W. J. van der Kuijp'.Leonard W. J. Van der Kuijp & Klaus K. Klostermaier - 1979 - Philosophy East and West 29 (4):515 - 518.
The fragile nature of contextual preference reversals: Reply to Tsetsos, Chater, and Usher (2015).Jennifer S. Trueblood, Scott D. Brown & Andrew Heathcote - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (4):848-853.
Linda L. Emanuel and Ezekiel J. Emanuel.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - forthcoming - Contemporary Issues in Bioethics.
A better approach to goodness: Reply to Wagemans (1999).Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):622-630.
Feedback by Any Other Name Is Still Interactivity: A Reply to Roelofs (2004).Brenda Rapp & Matthew Goldrick - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (2):573-578.
How Many Selves in Emotion Experience? Reply to Dalgleish and Power (2004).Anthony J. Marcel & John A. Lambie - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (3):820-826.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,251,898)
6 months
1 (#1,580,527)
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,251,898)
6 months
1 (#1,580,527)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.Robert Schwartz & David Marr - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):411.
Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns.E. L. Leeuwenberg - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (2):216-220.
Goodness of visual regularities: A nontransformational approach.Peter A. van der Helm & Emanuel L. J. Leeuwenberg - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (3):429-456.
Toward a better approach to goodness: Comments on Van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996).Johan Wagemans - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (3):610-621.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-xhc6d uwo