Extensionality Versus Constructivity

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (2):179-187 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We analyze some extensions of Martin-Löf 's constructive type theory by means of extensional set constructors and we show that often the most natural requirements over them lead to classical logic or even to inconsistency

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

EM + Ext− + ACint is equivalent to ACext.Jesper Carlström - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (3):236-240.
The inconsistency of higher order extensions of Martin-löf's type theory.Bart Jacobs - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):399 - 422.
A minimalist two-level foundation for constructive mathematics.Maria Emilia Maietti - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (3):319-354.
Realizing Mahlo set theory in type theory.Michael Rathjen - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (1):89-101.
Well-ordering proofs for Martin-Löf type theory.Anton Setzer - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (2):113-159.
The strength of some Martin-Löf type theories.Edward Griffor & Michael Rathjen - 1994 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 33 (5):347-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
39 (#652,231)

6 months
9 (#461,271)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The inconsistency of higher order extensions of Martin-löf's type theory.Bart Jacobs - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):399 - 422.

Add more references