Equal Citizenship and Convergence

Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (5):846-853 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue against Lori Watson and Christie Hartley's recent criticisms of convergence approaches to public justification. In particular, I argue that convergence approaches can capture what is distinctive about democratic decisionā€making and provide an attractive account of stability for the right reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-24

Downloads
37 (#626,055)

6 months
8 (#561,815)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Vallier
Bowling Green State University

Citations of this work

Public justification, gender, and the family.Elsa Kugelberg & Henrik D. Kugelberg - 2024 - European Journal of Political Theory 23 (1):4-22.
A More Liberal Public Reason Liberalism.Roberto Fumagalli - 2023 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 10 (2):337-366.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references