Incomplete grounding: the theory of symbolic separation is contradicted by pervasive stability in attitudes and behavior

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proposed theory is broad enough to accommodate the reduction or elimination of prior influences by a variety of acts symbolizing separation. However, it does not account for stability in psychological variables, and is contradicted by widely documented stability in people's actual attitudes and behavior over time, in multiple domains, despite people's pervasive everyday acts of symbolic separation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,641

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Concepts versus conceptions (again).Georges Rey - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):221-222.
Simplicity, and stability in there.Byunghan Kim - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):822-836.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-19

Downloads
19 (#1,169,766)

6 months
5 (#860,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references