- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Saving/Creating Distinction and the Axiology of the Cost–Benefit Approach to Neonatal Medicine
American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):29-31 (2017)
Abstract
The aim of this commentary is to discuss the axiology of the cost–benefit approach assumed by Travis Rieder (2017) to analyze medical decision making in the case of extremely preterm infants.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Saving or Creating: Which Are We Doing When We Resuscitate Extremely Preterm Infants?Travis N. Rieder - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):4-12.
Postponed Withholding: The Wrong Nudge.Stephanie Kukora, Naomi Laventhal & Marin Arnolds - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):66-69.
Opinions of paediatricians who teach neonatal resuscitation about resuscitation practices on extremely preterm infants in the delivery room.Cristiane Ribeiro Ambrosio, Adriana Sanudo, Alma M. Martinez, Maria Fernanda Branco de Almeida & Ruth Guinsburg - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (11):725-728.
The Social Cost of Carbon: Valuing Inequality, Risk, and Population for Climate Policy.Marc Fleurbaey, Maddalena Ferranna, Mark Budolfson, Francis Dennig, Kian Mintz-Woo, Robert Socolow, Dean Spears & Stéphane Zuber - 2019 - The Monist 102 (1):84-109.
Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?Lars Sandman, Jan Liliemark, Erik Gustavsson & Martin Henriksson - 2024 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 27 (3):349-357.
Decision-making at the border of viability: determining the best interests of extremely preterm infants.Eric Vogelstein - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):773-779.
Life and death choices in neonatal care: applying shared decision-making focused on parental values.Alexander A. Kon - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):35 - 36.
Research involving children: Direct benefit or social value? [REVIEW]Carlo Petrini - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):387-388.
What is the best age to circumcise? A medical and ethical analysis.Alex Myers & Brian D. Earp - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (7):645-663.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-08-04
Downloads
591 (#48,889)
6 months
84 (#75,914)
2017-08-04
Downloads
591 (#48,889)
6 months
84 (#75,914)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence.David Benatar - 2006 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence.David Benatar - 2009 - Human Studies 32 (1):101-108.
The Value of Existence.Wlodek Rabinowicz & Gustaf Arrhenius - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson, The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. New York NY: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 424-444.
Asymmetries in the morality of causing people to exist.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - In David Wasserman & Melinda Roberts, Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Springer. pp. 49--68.
Saving or Creating: Which Are We Doing When We Resuscitate Extremely Preterm Infants?Travis N. Rieder - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (8):4-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-dwqgq uwo