The non-factive turn in epistemology: some hypotheses

In Veli Mitova, The Factive Turn in Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 219-228 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I evaluate non-factive or truth-insensitive accounts of the ordinary concepts used to evaluate beliefs, evidence, assertions, and decisions. Recent findings show that these accounts are mistaken. I propose three hypotheses regarding how philosophers defending these accounts got things so wrong. I also consider one potential consequence for the discipline.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mythology of the Factive.John Turri - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (1):141-150.
Motivating Reason to Slow the Factive Turn in Epistemology.J. Drake - 2017 - In Veli Mitova, The Factive Turn in Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-22.
The New Evil Demon and the Devil in the Details.Mikkel Gerken - 2017 - In Veli Mitova, The Factive Turn in Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 102-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-28

Downloads
564 (#51,864)

6 months
91 (#70,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Theory of knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.

View all 36 references / Add more references