Can Culture Excuse Crime

Punishment and Society 6:395-409 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The inability thesis holds that one’s culture determines behavior and can make one unable to comply with the law and therefore less deserving of punishment. Opponents of the thesis reject the view that humans are made physically unable to act certain ways by their cultural upbringing. The article seeks to help evaluate the inability thesis by pointing to a literature in cultural psychology and anthropology presenting empirical evidence of the influence of culture on behavior, and offering conceptual analysis of the concept of determinism and its connection to moral culpability. Without conceding that culture never determines behavior, I argue that opponents of the inability thesis err in drawing a moral implication from this premise. What matters in formulating moral judgments about punishment are not the possibility but the reasonability of complying with the law. Cultural influences may make an action reasonable that without similar cultural influences would be unreasonable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-12

Downloads
3,047 (#3,233)

6 months
202 (#15,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Tunick
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral relativism defended.Gilbert Harman - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (1):3-22.
The ethics of culture.Samuel Fleischacker - 1994 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Is Virtue Possible?Michael Slote - 1982 - Analysis 42 (2):70 - 76.

View all 7 references / Add more references