Spinoza’s Hobbesian Naturalism and Its Promise for a Feminist Theory of Power

Revista Conatus - Filosofia de Spinoza 7 (13):11-23 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines recent feminist work on Spinoza and identifies the elements of Spinoza’s philosophy that have been seen as promising for feminist naturalism. I argue that the elements of Spinoza’s work that feminist theorists have found so promising are precisely those concepts he derives from Hobbes. I argue that the misunderstanding of Hobbes as architect of the egoist model of human nature has effaced his contribution to Spinoza’s more praised conception of the human individual. Despite misconceptions, I argue that the model of human nature, the view on human emotions and the conception of individual power that Hobbes created and Spinoza developed is an uncommonly useful one for feminist political theory. Through reexamining Hobbes’ model of human nature and the emotions I will argue that Hobbes’ theory of the internal weighing of emotions provides an important mechanism for understanding how the individuals’ affects can be reformed. I will show how we can use this naturalistic model of the human individual to answer contemporary theoretical and practical questions of how to empower women and how to effectively identify, challenge and change social categories, norms and institutions which are disempowering. In particular, I will argue that feminist projects of empowerment need a way to measure empowerment and a way to understand how to understand the power of harmful norms and customs. Understanding the way certain norms and practices disempower women while forming their affects and self‐conceptions provides the first step to reform of these practices. Spinoza and Hobbes provide us with a further tool to reform, and that is their understanding of the role of emotions in human action and power, and the need to reform and reorganize the emotions of individuals in order to escape harmful patterns of behavior.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Spinoza's Multitude.Ericka Tucker - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos, Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Burlington, VT, USA: Imprint Academic.
Multitude.Ericka Tucker - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos, Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Burlington, VT, USA: Imprint Academic. pp. 129-141.
Spinoza and Hobbes.Michael LeBuffe - 2021 - In Yitzhak Y. Melamed, A Companion to Spinoza. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 81–91.
Power Freedom and Relational Autonomy.Ericka Tucker - 2019 - In Aurelia Armstrong, Keith Green & Andrea Sangiacomo, Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others. Edinburgh: Eup. pp. 149-163.
Power, freedom and relational autonomy.Ericka Tucker - 2019 - In Aurelia Armstrong, Keith Green & Andrea Sangiacomo, Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others. Edinburgh: Eup. pp. 149-163.
Spinoza and Hobbes.Michael LeBuffe - 2021 - In Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Blackwell Companion to Spinoza. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. pp. 81-92.
Three Essays on Spinoza's Philosophy.Charles David Huenemann - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-28

Downloads
862 (#28,431)

6 months
101 (#62,296)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ericka Tucker
Marquette University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality of whom? Social groups and judgments of injustice.Iris Marion Young - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (1):1–18.
17th and 18th century theories of emotions.Amy Morgan Schmitter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references