The Weaker Seed. The Sexist Bias of Reproductive Theory

Hypatia 3 (1):35-59 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This history of reproductive theories from Aristotle to the preformationists provides an excellent illustration of the ways in which the gender /science system informs the process of scientific investigation. In this essay I examine the effects of the bias of woman's inferiority upon theories of human reproduction. I argue that the adherence to a belief in the inferiority of the female creative principle biased scientific perception of the nature of woman's role in human generation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
100 (#212,072)

6 months
23 (#133,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Tuana
Pennsylvania State University

References found in this work

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1273 - Hayes Barton Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
The Complete Works: The Rev. Oxford Translation.Jonathan Barnes (ed.) - 1984 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Matter, Life and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate.Shirley A. Roe - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (1):94-99.
A History of Embryology.Joseph Needham - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (44):492-492.

View all 12 references / Add more references