Psychoactive drug use: Expand the scope of outcome assessment

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (6):324-325 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The “hijacking” and “drug instrumentalization” models of psychoactive drug use predict opposite outcomes in terms of adaptive behavior and fitness benefits. Which is the range of applicability of each model? To answer this question, we need more data than those reported by studies focusing on medical, psychiatric, and legal problems in addicted users. An evolutionary analysis requires a much wider focus.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Drug instrumentalization and evolution: Going even further.Daniel H. Lende - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (6):317-318.
Maximization should sometimes lead to abstinence.Suzanne H. Mitchell & William M. Baum - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):589-590.
Drug use as consumer behavior.Gordon Robert Foxall & Valdimar Sigurdsson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (6):313-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
31 (#735,444)

6 months
11 (#362,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Evolutionary explanations of emotions.Randolph M. Nesse - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (3):261-289.

Add more references