Return of Results in Digital Phenotyping: Ethical Considerations for Real-World Use Cases

&
American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):91-93 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their thoughtful paper, Shen et al. (2024) discuss optimal solutions to address the challenge of returning individual research results from digital phenotyping in psychiatry. Their conclusion to...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2024.2298146

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Contending with Real and Perceived Intrusiveness in Digital Phenotyping Research.Josianne Barrette-Moran & Charles Dupras - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):108-110.
Potential Iatrogenic Effects of Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Kate Finley - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):110-112.
Respecting the Value-Laden Nature of Participant Preferences: AI, Digital Phenotyping, and Psychiatry.Bryan Pilkington, Jack Noto, Daniel Silverstein & Charles E. Binkley - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):93-96.
Balancing the Double-Edged Implications of AI in Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping.Katherine Bassil - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):113-115.
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.Francis X. Shen, Matthew L. Baum, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Adam S. Miner, Melissa Abraham, Catherine A. Brownstein, Nathan Cortez, Barbara J. Evans, Laura T. Germine, David C. Glahn, Christine Grady, Ingrid A. Holm, Elisa A. Hurley, Sara Kimble, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Kimberlyn Leary, Mason Marks, Patrick J. Monette, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, P. Pearl O’Rourke, Scott L. Rauch, Carmel Shachar, Srijan Sen, Ipsit Vahia, Jason L. Vassy, Justin T. Baker, Barbara E. Bierer & Benjamin C. Silverman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):69-90.
Personalized Roadmaps for Returning Results From Digital Phenotyping.Kristin Marie Kostick-Quenet, John Herrington & Eric A. Storch - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):102-105.
Psychiatry, Ethics, and Digital Phenotyping: Moral Challenges and Considerations for Returning Mental Health Research Results to College Students.Craig W. McFarland, Makenna E. Law, Ivan E. Ramirez, Ithika S. Senthilnathan & Kelisha M. Williams - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):105-108.
Navigating the Ethical Maze in Digital Health Research.Camille Nebeker - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):99-102.
Incorporating Research Burden and Utility Considerations as Limiting Factors in a Framework for Returning IRR.Chloe Connor & Benjamin E. Berkman - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (2):96-98.
Incidental Findings from Deep Phenotyping Research in Psychiatry: Legal and Ethical Considerations.Amanda Kim, Michael Hsu, Amanda Koire & Matthew L. Baum - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (4):482-486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-02

Downloads
24 (#909,478)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic Injustice and Illness.Ian James Kidd & Havi Carel - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):172-190.

Add more references