Language, text, structure, model,(secondary) modeling system are these notions the dynamism of which—in the volume of their meaning—gives a good overview of the semiotics of Lotman and the Tartu–Moscow semiotic school until the birth of cultural semiotics in 1973. K. Eimermacher has called Lotmans ability to conjoin different terms and to provide them with novel meanings integrativity, and to this he also dedicated an article “JM Lotman: Semiotic Version of Integrative Culturology”(Eimermacher 1998 ... [Book Review]

Sign Systems Studies 27:9-23 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Torop, Peeter (1999) "Cultural semiotics and culture". Sign Systems Studies 27():9-23

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On spatiality in Tartu–Moscow cultural semiotics.Anti Randviir - 2007 - Sign Systems Studies 35 (1-2):137-158.
The institution of semiotics in Estonia.Silvi Salupere - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):314-341.
Semiotic study of landscapes.Kati Lindström, Kalevi Kull & Hannes Palang - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2-4):12-36.
Lotman on mimesis.Jelena Grigorjeva - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (1):217-237.
Maastike semiootiline uurimine.Kati Lindström, Kalevi Kull & Hannes Palang - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):36-36.
Verse as a semiotic system.Mihhail Lotman - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (1/2):18-50.
On semiotic (un)predictability.Ekaterina Velmezova - 2016 - Sign Systems Studies 44 (1-2):248-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
11 (#1,427,285)

6 months
11 (#362,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references