Does God Have the Moral Standing to Blame?

Faith and Philosophy 35 (1):33-55 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I introduce a problem to the philosophy of religion – the problem of divine moral standing – and explain how this problem is distinct from (albeit related to) the more familiar problem of evil (with which it is often conflated). In short, the problem is this: in virtue of how God would be (or, on some given conception, is) “involved in” our actions, how is it that God has the moral standing to blame us for performing those very actions? In light of the recent literature on “moral standing”, I consider God’s moral standing to blame on two models of “divine providence”: open theism, and theological determinism. I contend that God may have standing on open theism, and – perhaps surprisingly – may also have standing, even on theological determinism, given the truth of compatibilism. Thus, if you think that God could not justly both determine and blame, then you will have to abandon compatibilism. The topic of this paper thus sheds considerable light on the traditional philosophical debate about the conditions of moral responsibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Manipulators and Moral Standing.Benjamin Matheson - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (4):1197-1214.
Explaining Loss of Standing to Blame.Justin Snedegar - 2023 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 21 (3-4):404-432.
Resisting Todd’s Moral-Standing Zygote Argument.Michael McKenna - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (273):657-678.
Natural Compatibilists Should Be Theological Compatibilists.Taylor Cyr - 2022 - In Leigh Vicens & Peter Furlong, Theological Determinism: New Perspectives. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 119-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-15

Downloads
1,663 (#9,449)

6 months
181 (#21,200)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Todd
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Let's See You Do Better.Patrick Todd - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.
Criticism as Conversation.Daniela Dover - 2019 - Philosophical Perspectives 33 (1):26-61.
The Replication Argument for Incompatibilism.Patrick Todd - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (6):1341-1359.
An Actual-Sequence Theology.John Martin Fischer - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):49-78.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Freedom Within Reason.Susan Wolf - 1990 - New York: Oup Usa.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):129-134.
Agency and answerability: selected essays.Gary Watson - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references