Methodology and Innovation in Jurisprudence [Book Review]

Columbia Law Review 123:2483-2516 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jurisprudence aims to identify and explain important features of law. To accomplish this task, what procedure or method should one employ? Elucidating Law, a tour de force in “the philosophy of legal philosophy,” develops an instructive account of how philosophers “elucidate law,” which elucidates jurisprudence’s own aims and methods. This Review introduces the book, with emphasis on its discussion of methodology. Next, the Review proposes complementing methodological clarification with methodological innovation. Jurisprudence should ask timeless questions, but its methods need not stagnate. Consider that jurisprudence has a long tradition of asserting claims about how “we” understand the law---where “we” might refer to all people, ordinary people, legal experts, or legal officials. There are now rich empirical literatures that bear on these claims, and methods from “experimental jurisprudence” and related disciplines can assess untested assertions. Today’s jurisprudence can achieve greater rigor by complementing traditional methods with empirical ones.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-24

Downloads
169 (#142,950)

6 months
14 (#181,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Tobia
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Methodology.Grant Lamond - 2020 - In John Tasioulas, The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Law. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references