On the View that People and Not Institutions Bear Primary Credit for Success in Governance: Confucian Arguments

Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 32:65-97 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explicates the influential Confucian view that “people” and not “institutional rules” are the proper sources of good governance and social order, as well as some notable Confucian objections to this position. It takes Xunzi 荀子, Hu Hong 胡宏, and Zhu Xi 朱熹 as the primary representatives of the “virtue-centered” position, which holds that people’s good character and not institutional rules bear primary credit for successful governance. And it takes Huang Zongxi 黃宗羲 as a major advocate for the “institutionalist” position, which holds that institutional rules have some power to effect success independently of improvements in character. Historians have often called attention to this debate but left the major arguments and positions relatively unspecified. As I show, the Confucian virtue-centered view is best captured in two theses: first, that reforming people is far more demanding than reforming institutional rules; second, that once the rules have reached a certain threshold of viability, further improvements in those rules are unlikely to be effective on their own. Once we specify the theses in this way, we can catalogue the different respects and degrees to which the more virtue-centered political thinkers endorse virtue-centrism in governance. Zhu Xi, for example, turns out to endorse a stronger version of virtue-centrism than Hu Hong. I also use this account of the major theses to show that Huang Zongxi, who is sometimes regarded as historical Confucianism’s foremost institutionalist, has more complicated and mixed views about the power of institutional reform than scholars usually assume.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

H uang Zongxi as a Republican: A Theory of Governance for Confucian Democracy.Elton Chan - 2018 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17 (2):203-218.
Dasan’s Philosophy of Law.Gordon B. Mower - 2023 - Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 39:129-156.
Meritocracy and the Tests of Virtue in Greek and Confucian Political Thought.Justin Tiwald & Jeremy Reid - 2024 - Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture 41:111–147.
Xunzi and Zhu Xi.John Berthrong - 2013 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (3-4):400-416.
Confucian Constitutionalism without Remedies.Justin Tiwald - 2022 - Philosophy East and West 72 (2):506-517.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-25

Downloads
1,671 (#9,377)

6 months
303 (#7,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin Tiwald
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

Song-Ming Confucianism.Justin Tiwald - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Huang Zongxi’s Confucian political moralism.Wenqing Zhao - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (6):973-991.
Confucian Constitutionalism without Remedies.Justin Tiwald - 2022 - Philosophy East and West 72 (2):506-517.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references