Reply to professor Cebik

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):464-466 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

TILGHMAN, B. R.: "But is it Art"?G. Currie - 1986 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64:231.
A reply to professor Silvers.Review author[S.]: Warren E. Steinkraus - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):227-229.
A Reply to Professor Margolis.George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229.
A reply to professor Margolis.Review author[S.]: George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229-231.
A Reply to Professor Silvers.Warren E. Steinkraus - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):227.
Why B-Flat Is Not Natural: Reply to Dyck.Matteo Ravasio - 2017 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (2):187-191.
Culture and art: an anthology.Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.) - 1976 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#536,249)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references