Berkeley's "Proper Object of Vision"

Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (2):243 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2708910

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,957

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Berkeley's New Theory of Vision.David M. Armstrong - 1956 - Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (1/4):127.
Berkeley and the spatiality of vision.Rick Grush - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):413-442.
The Proper Object of Vision.Gary Thrane - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6 (1):3.
The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated.Thomas M. Lennon - 2007 - History of European Ideas 33 (3):321-329.
The Constructivism of Berkeley's New Theory of Vision.Bertil Belfrage - 1992 - In Phillip D. Cummins, Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
Is light the proper object of vision?F. R. Pickering - 1975 - Mind 84 (January):119-121.
Margaret Atherton, "Berkeley's Revolution in Vision". [REVIEW]Douglas Michael Jesseph - 1992 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (2):306.
Depth and Distance in Berkeley's Theory of Vision.Akira Hara - 2004 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (1):101 - 117.
CHAPTER 18. The Issue of "Common Sensibles" in Berkeley's New Theory of Vision.Margaret Dauler Wilson - 1999 - In Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press. pp. 257-275.
Discussion: Berkeley's New Theory of Vision.David M. Armstrong - 1956 - Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (1):127-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
23 (#1,034,211)

6 months
10 (#388,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Berkeley and the ‘Mighty Difficulty’.Gideon Yaffe - 2003 - Philosophical Topics 31 (1-2):485-510.
The Role of Visual Language in Berkeley’s Account of Generality.Katherine Dunlop - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):525-559.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references