Value judgments and risk comparisons : the case of genetically engineered crops

In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and values: essential readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 347-355 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Genetically Engineered Crops: Separating the Myths From the Reality.Miguel A. Altieri - 2001 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 21 (2):130-147.
Ethical Concerns in Development, Research and Consumption of Genetically Engineered Crops.Shayla Bhuiya - 2012 - Synesis: A Journal of Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy 3 (1):G60 - G65.
Genetically Engineered Oil Seed Crops and Novel Terrestrial Nutrients: Ethical Considerations.Chris MacDonald, Stefanie Colombo & Michael T. Arts - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (5):1485-1497.
Genetically-engineered crops and their effects on varietal diversity: a case of Bt eggplant in India.Deepthi Elizabeth Kolady & William Lesser - 2012 - Agriculture and Human Values 29 (1):3-15.
Genetics and reproductive risk : Can having children be immoral?Laura M. Purdy - 2010 - In Craig Hanks (ed.), Technology and values: essential readings. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Science and values in risk assessment: The case of deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms. [REVIEW]Soemini Kasanmoentalib - 1996 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1):42-60.
Genetically Modified Crops and the Precautionary Principle: Is There a Case for a Moratorium?Jonathan Hughes - 2003 - In B. Almond & M. Parker (eds.), Ethical Issues in the New Genetics: Are Genes Us? Ashgate. pp. 143-152.
Problem Formulation and Option Assessment (PFOA) Linking Governance and Environmental Risk Assessment for Technologies: A Methodology for Problem Analysis of Nanotechnologies and Genetically Engineered Organisms.Kristen C. Nelson, David A. Andow & Michael J. Banker - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):732-748.
Say No to GMOs! (Genetically Modified Organisms).Gene Thomas & Chris Picone - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-09-15

Downloads
1 (#1,944,679)

6 months
1 (#1,886,949)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul B. Thompson
Michigan State University

Citations of this work

What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World?Paul B. Thompson & Kyle Powys Whyte - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):485-498.
Norton’s Sustainability: Some Comments on Risk and Sustainability.Paul B. Thompson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (4):375-386.
Epilogue: Publics, Hybrids, Transparency, Monsters and the Changing Landscape around Science.Stephen Turner - 2018 - In Sarah Hartley, Sujatha Raman, Alexander Smith & Brigitte Nerlich (eds.), Science and the politics of openness : Here be monsters. Manchester University Press.
The agricultural ethics of biofuels: A first look. [REVIEW]Paul B. Thompson - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):183-198.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references