The sorites paradox

Synthese 61 (3):391 - 421 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A solution to the sorites paradox is obtained by distinguishing three formats of the sorites argument and appraising them in the light of four fundamental considerations: (i) the appropriate notion of truth for the application of vague predicates to their borderline cases, (ii) a certain construal of borderline cases, (iii) a certain freedom of use of vague terms not enjoyed by non-Vague terms and (iv) the revocation of that freedom by deductive contexts

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bivalence and the Sorites Paradox.John L. King - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):17 - 25.
The sorites paradox.Richmond Campbell - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 26 (3-4):175-191.
The Sorites Paradox and the Ordinary Use of Vague Predicates.Sean Foran - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4):303 - 318.
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.
Sorites Paradox and Vague Geographies.Pete Fischer - 2000 - Fuzzy Sets and Systems 113 (1):7--18.
The Sorites paradox in linguistics.Chris Kennedy - 2019 - In Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini, The Sorites Paradox. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Dialetheism and the Sorites paradox.Graham Priest - 2019 - In Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini, The Sorites Paradox. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
The Sorites paradox in psychology.Paul Égré, David Ripley & Steven Verheyen - 2019 - In Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini, The Sorites Paradox. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#246,173)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Fetal personhood and the sorites paradox.Lee F. Kerckhove & Sara Waller - 1998 - Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (2):175-189.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Index, context, and content.David K. Lewis - 1980 - In Stig Kanger & Sven Öhman, Philosophy and Grammar. Reidel. pp. 79-100.
Wang's paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.
On the coherence of vague predicates.Crispin Wright - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):325--65.

View all 15 references / Add more references