Looking away: phenomenality and dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno

Cambridge: Harvard University Press (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Looking Away, Rei Terada revisits debates about appearance and reality in order to make a startling claim: that the purpose of such debates is to police feelings of dissatisfaction with the given world. Terada proposes that the connection between dissatisfaction and ephemeral phenomenality reveals a hitherto-unknown alternative to aesthetics that expresses our right to desire something other than experience "as is", even those parts of it that really cannot be otherwise.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Index.Rei Terada - 2009 - In Looking away: phenomenality and dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 219-225.
Pretext.Rei Terada - 2009 - In Looking away: phenomenality and dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 1-34.
Bibliography.Rei Terada - 2009 - In Looking away: phenomenality and dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 207-218.
Postscript.Rei Terada - 2009 - In Looking away: phenomenality and dissatisfaction, Kant to Adorno. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 199-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#457,686)

6 months
4 (#1,247,093)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeology.Alison Wylie - 2015 - In Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer. pp. 189-210.
Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies.Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.) - 2015 - Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer.
Introduction: Objectivity in Science.Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani - 2015 - In Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), Objectivity in Science: New Perspectives From Science and Technology Studies. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 310. Springer. pp. 1-15.
The Official World.Mark Seltzer - 2011 - Critical Inquiry 37 (4):724-753.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references