- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Logic of Number
Oxford University Press (2022)
Abstract
This book develops Tennant's Natural Logicist account of the foundations of the natural, rational, and real numbers. Tennant uses this framework to distinguish the logical from the intuitive aspects of the basic elements of arithmetic.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Frege and Wittgenstein on Identity, Logic, and Number.Steven Frederick Savitt - 1972 - Dissertation, Brandeis University
Preschool children master the logic of number word meanings.Jennifer S. Lipton & Elizabeth S. Spelke - 2006 - Cognition 98 (3):57-66.
Charles S. Peirce on the Logic of Number.Paul Bartram Shields - 1981 - Dissertation, Fordham University
What does it take to prove fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory.Colin McLarty - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):359-377.
Manifest invalidity: Neil Tennant's new argument for intuitionism.Jon Cogburn - 2003 - Synthese 134 (3):353 - 362.
Prizing truth from warranted assertibility: reply to Tennant.Jim Edwards - 1999 - Analysis 59 (4):300-308.
Which Paradox is Genuine in Accordance with the Proof-Theoretic Criterion for Paradoxicality?Seungrak Choi - 2023 - Korean Journal of Logic 3 (26):145-181.
Tennant Neil. Natural logic. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1978, ix + 196 pp. [REVIEW]Wilfried Sieg - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (1):215-217.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-10-13
Downloads
36 (#634,807)
6 months
11 (#364,844)
2022-10-13
Downloads
36 (#634,807)
6 months
11 (#364,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Frege meets Belnap: Basic Law V in a Relevant Logic.Shay Logan & Francesca Boccuni - 2025 - In Andrew Tedder, Shawn Standefer & Igor Sedlar (eds.), New Directions in Relevant Logic. Springer. pp. 381-404.
Which ‘Intensional Paradoxes’ are Paradoxes?Neil Tennant - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 53 (4):933-957.
Of Marriage and Mathematics: Inferentialism and Social Ontology.James Henry Collin - 2023 - Topoi 42 (1):247-257.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-72rpk uwo