Abstract

The paper is a comment on Nicholas Rescher's article about Leibnizian optimalism. In this text, Rescher takes up Leibniz's question 'Why is there anything at all?' and defends metaphysical optimalism as a proper answer. While I agree with Rescher's overall line of reasoning I disagree with the way he treats the relation between optimalism and theism. Unlike Rescher, I make a case for the claim that optimalism presupposes theism.