Arthur Balfour and educational change: The myth revisited

British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (2):133-149 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the political background to the 1902 Education Act, and argues that Balfour's commitment to the measure was founded more an political expediency than a desire to initiate major educational reform. It concludes that Balfour's interest in education was, at best, lukewarm, at worst, apathetic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Implementing the education act of 1902.Eric Eaglesham - 1962 - British Journal of Educational Studies 10 (2):153-175.
Special educational needs and the education reform act, 19881.Ian Copeland - 1991 - British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (2):190-206.
The 1902 education act: The search for a compromise.D. R. Pugh - 1968 - British Journal of Educational Studies 16 (2):164-178.
Special Educational Needs and the Education Reform Act, 1988.Ian Copeland - 1991 - British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (2):190 - 206.
Churches and children—A study in the controversy over the 1902 education act.Alan Rogers - 1959 - British Journal of Educational Studies 8 (1):29-51.
The ‘pink‐tank’ on the education reform act.James Tooley - 1992 - British Journal of Educational Studies 40 (4):335-349.
The Education Reform Act, 1988. Its Origins and Implications.Michael Flude & Merril Hammer - 1991 - British Journal of Educational Studies 39 (1):86-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
40 (#563,866)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Cockerton case revised: London politics and education 1898–1901.Tony Taylor - 1982 - British Journal of Educational Studies 30 (3):329-348.

Add more references