Climate Reparations: Why the polluter pays principle is neither unfair nor unreasonable

WIREs Climate Change 14 (4) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The polluter pays principle (PPP) has the form of a reparative principle. It holds that since some countries have historically contributed more to global warming than others, these countries have the follow-up responsibility now to do more to address climate change. Yet in the climate justice debate, PPP is often rejected for two reasons. First, so the objection goes, it wrongly burdens present-day individuals because the actions of their predecessors. This is the unfairness objection. The second objection is that early polluters were not aware of the harm that they were doing, and so ought not to be held culpable. This is the objection from excusable ignorance. In this commentary, I defend PPP against these two objections. The aim of this short reflection is not to provide a full justification of PPP, or to respond to all objections that have been made against it. My more limited but, I hope, important goal is to show that PPP is neither immediately unfair (in making innocent parties pay) nor immediately unreasonable (in making excusably ignorant parties pay) as is commonly noted, and is therefore worthy of further consideration as a principle of climate justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The forward-looking polluter pays principle for a just climate transition.Fausto Corvino - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Justice and the duties of the advantaged: a defence.Simon Caney - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):543-552.
Should the beneficiaries pay?Robert Huseby - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):1470594-13506366.
Should the beneficiaries pay?Robert Huseby - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (2):209-225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-12

Downloads
64 (#344,708)

6 months
18 (#145,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kok-Chor Tan
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Carbon Pricing and Intergenerational Fairness.Fausto Corvino - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references