Memory for dangers past: threat contexts produce more consistent learning than do non-threatening contexts

Cognition and Emotion 33 (5):1031-1040 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn earlier work we showed that individuals learn the spatial regularities within contexts and use this knowledge to guide detection of threatening targets embedded in these contexts. While it is highly adaptive for humans to use contextual learning to detect threats, it is equally adaptive for individuals to flexibly readjust behaviour when contexts once associated with threatening stimuli begin to be associated with benign stimuli, and vice versa. Here, we presented face targets varying in salience in new or old spatial configurations and changed the target salience halfway through the experiment to examine if contextual learning changes with the change in target salience. Detection of threatening targets was faster in old than new configurations and this learning persisted even after the target changed to non-threatening. However, the same pattern was not seen when the targets changed from non-threatening...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Context learning for threat detection.Akos Szekely, Suparna Rajaram & Aprajita Mohanty - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (8):1525-1542.
Threat priming diminishes the gaze cueing effect.Manman Zhai & Jari K. Hietanen - 2024 - Cognition and Emotion 38 (7):1095-1102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-11

Downloads
26 (#850,497)

6 months
7 (#702,633)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations