Necessary A priori / a posteriori Truth

American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2):113-123 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two sentences express the same proposition if they are synonymous; they express the same statement if they attribute the same properties to the same objects at the same time (however objects and times are picked out). Neither propositions nor statements are necessary a posteriori. Suggested examples of the necessary a posteriori, such as "Hesperus is Phosphorus", or "water is H2O", only appear to be such because of a confusion between proposition and statement.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Defence of Kripke.Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hodjati - 2024 - Logos and Episteme 15 (1):31-36.
Necessary a Posteriori Truth.Cynthia Jayne Bolton - 1992 - Dissertation, Michigan State University
Is Water Necessarily Identical to H2O?Barnett David - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 98 (1):95-108.
Plantinga's Necessary A Posteriori Truths.Gregory W. Fitch - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):323-327.
De Sousa On Kripke and Theoretical Identities.R. M. Yoshida - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):137-141.
The Place of Logic in Philosophy.David Grünberg - 2019 - Felsefe Arkivi 51:351-353.
The necessary a posteriori: A response to tichý. [REVIEW]Curtis Brown - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 45 (3):379 - 397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-04-12

Downloads
77 (#275,376)

6 months
4 (#1,288,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Modal skepticism and counterfactual knowledge.Juhani Yli-Vakkuri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):605-623.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references