Designing a Good Life: A Matrix for the Technological Mediation of Morality [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):157-172 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Technologies fulfill a social role in the sense that they influence the moral actions of people, often in unintended and unforeseen ways. Scientists and engineers are already accepting much responsibility for the technological, economical and environmental aspects of their work. This article asks them to take an extra step, and now also consider the social role of their products. The aim is to enable engineers to take a prospective responsibility for the future social roles of their technologies by providing them with a matrix that helps to explore in advance how emerging technologies might plausibly affect the reasons behind people’s (moral) actions. On the horizontal axis of the matrix, we distinguished the three basic types of reasons that play a role in practical judgment: what is the case, what can be done and what should be done. On the vertical axis we distinguished the morally relevant classes of issues: stakeholders, consequences and the good life. To illustrate how this matrix may work in practice, the final section applies the matrix to the case of the Google PowerMeter.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technological delegation: Responsibility for the unintended.Katinka Waelbers - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):51-68.
Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation.Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2006 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 31 (3):361-380.
Climate Change and the Ethics of Technology.Vera Tripodi - 2023 - In Gianfranco Pellegrino & Marcello Di Paola (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Springer. pp. 957-973.
Good healthcare is in the “how”.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2014 - In Simon Peter van Rysewyk & Matthijs Pontier (eds.), Machine Medical Ethics. Springer. pp. 33-47.
Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies: An Introduction.Ibo van de Poel (ed.) - 2023 - Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-04

Downloads
185 (#131,890)

6 months
25 (#127,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

T. E. Swierstra
Maastricht University