Abstract

This paper examines the figure of the child in Spinoza’s work: few commentators have focused on analysing this theme, which is certainly eccentric, within the context of Spinoza’s philosophy, with the notable exception of François Zourabichvili; his main conclusions must be taken up again, but also their validity must be tested. The question is then to know if there is a specific nature of the child: is he a being in the process of becoming without a specific nature? is he only a smaller adult? We argue that this nature exists, and that its analysis can form both an anthropology and a psychology of childhood based on Spinoza. However, a condition is required to think of this nature in relation to that of the adult: to conceive of a progressive, albeit real, transformation in the transition from early childhood to adulthood. Such a transformation is what an education understood as ethical must accompany, which is addressed both to the child in his becoming an adult, and to the adult who is ignorant in his becoming active.