The "Double Decision" Makes Sense -- But for Whom? A Reply to Herf

&
Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1983 (56):130-145 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3817/0683056130

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Double Decision Still Makes Sense: A Response to My Critics.Jeffrey Herf - 1983 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1983 (56):156-171.
Western Strategy and Public Discussion: The Double Decision Makes Sense.J. Herf - 1982 - Télos 1982 (52):114-128.
Offensive Critical Theory? Reply to Honneth.James Schmidt - 1979 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1979 (39):62-70.
Reply to Castoriadis.Victor Zaslavsky - 1982 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1982 (53):198-201.
Modernity, libertarianism and critical theory: reply to Pellicani.Alex Delfini & Paul Piccone - 1998 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1998 (112):23-46.
Reply to Alt.Francis Hearn - 1978 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1978 (37):217-220.
Reply to Tymowski.Lawrence Goodwyn - 1992 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1992 (91):131-134.
Reply to Levy.Jacques Rancière - 1977 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1977 (33):119-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
12 (#1,368,341)

6 months
7 (#704,497)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references