Interests and Choices in Determining Death by Neurological Criteria

American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):118-121 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Death by neurological criteria (DNC) continues to stir global controversy. Philosophers and theologians contest its moral significance, clinicians and bioscientists debate its probative accuracy, a...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,108

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Determining Death and the Scope of Medical Obligations.D. Micah Hester - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):37-39.
Imposing Death: Religious Witness on Brain Death.Courtney S. Campbell - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):56-59.
Commentary on "the incoherence of determining death by neurological criteria".John P. Lizza - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (4):pp. 393-395.
Determining death by neurological criteria: current practice and ethics.Matthew Hanley - 2020 - Philadelphia, PA: National Catholic Bioethics Center.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-19

Downloads
19 (#1,117,267)

6 months
2 (#1,302,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?