- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Believing badly ain’t so bad
Philosophical Psychology 36 (6):1208-1216 (2023)
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic provides the newest example of staunch polarization in the epistemic community, providing ample opportunity for profound disagreements on its origin and the international resp...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ema Sullivan-Bissett, Helen Bradley, and Paul Noordhof, eds., Art and Belief (Oxford, UL: Oxford University Press, 2017). [REVIEW]Iskra Fileva - 2020 - Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (4):653-661.
COVID-19 and Sunday worship in the wake of the pandemic at Our Lady of Loreto, South Africa.Mathias F. Alubafi - 2024 - HTS Theological Studies 80 (1):6.
Theology and Ecology in a Time of Pandemic.Alexander J. B. Hampton & Annalea Rose Thiessen - 2020 - In Pandemic, Ecology and Theology: Perspectives on Covid-19. Routledge.
A new definition for global bioethics: COVID-19, a case study.Ruth Macklin - 2022 - Global Bioethics 33 (1):4-13.
COVID-19, the UN, and Dispersed Global Health Security.Sophie Harman - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 34 (3):373-378.
Vietnam’s Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak.Sanja Ivic - 2020 - Asian Bioethics Review 12 (3):341-347.
The Role of the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community in Overcoming the COVID-19 Pandemic.A. Indah Camelia, Koesrianti & Lina Hastuti - 2022 - Yuridika 37 (2):283-300.
The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy.Simon Lohse & Karim Bschir - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (4):1-5.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-05-31
Downloads
50 (#441,015)
6 months
9 (#504,609)
2022-05-31
Downloads
50 (#441,015)
6 months
9 (#504,609)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Bad beliefs: automaticity, arationality, and intervention.Stephen Gadsby - 2023 - Philosophical Psychology 36 (4):778-791.
Misinformation, observational equivalence and the possibility of rationality.Maarten van Doorn - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
References found in this work
Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories.Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey - 2016 - Thinking and Reasoning 22 (1):57-77.
The Factual Belief Fallacy.Neil Van Leeuwen - 2018 - Contemporary Pragmatism (eds. T. Coleman & J. Jong):319-343.
Is choice blindness a case of self-ignorance?Ema Sullivan-Bissett & Lisa Bortolotti - 2019 - Synthese 198 (6):5437-5454.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo